Lock Up Your Dogs and Hide Your Preteen Daughters, The Muslim Refugees Are Coming
With hundreds of thousands of so-called Syrian refugees on their way to the US, complements of the Obama Administration, we must realize what this means in terms of American society. Many of these people are not from Syria at all, but from various countries in the Mid-East. Most countries in that part of the world will not take any of them because they fear that ISIS and other terrorist factions are embedded among them. This is an easy assumption, since most of these people are military age men, with very few women and children among them.
What all of them are is Muslim, and they will be bringing their bent and perverted belief system here to the US with them, which means we should prepare ourselves for it.
Basically, we should know that these people will be expecting to live here in the US and continue the traditions they have been used to adhering to where they came from. This will include the ideal of sex and marriage of preteen girls by older men. Thus, our American ideas of pedophilia will have to change, or we will have an already over-populated prison system have to take in many more criminals than they can handle. What this boils down to is that there will be hundreds of thousands of Islamic men in this country who believe it is their right to have sex with and marry
Islamic men in this country who believe it is their right to have sex with and marry preteen girls—and this on top of the belief that each man can have multiple wives.
We will also have to lock up all of our dogs to keep them safe because most of these new Muslim residents will be out to kill as many of them as they can. The dog genocide can already be seen in various parts of Europe where these same refugees have settled.
The US will also begin to experience beheadings as the new choice of crime, since this is a common practice for Islamists.
What most Americans do not realize is that most of these refugees will initially be housed on various military bases where there are already thousands of illegal immigrants from Mexico and Central America still living on the premises.
Of course, the Federal government will try to accommodate them as much as possible by discouraging the sales of pork at supermarkets and restaurants, while requiring the sale of Halal meat. This is along with the discouragement of alcohol and coffee advertisements and sales because it may offend them.
We will soon see many Christian churches and related religious organizations vandalized and burned, and parishioners attacked because they represent a false belief system and all followers are infidels.
This is what we have to look forward to in the next few months under the Administration's plan
Politicians, pundits and private citizens have been sounding off on Barack
Obama’s new push for gun bans, but what do the professionals whose job it is to
use guns in the protection of their nation, their fellow countrymen and
themselves say?
Watch out
An open letter has been posted on the Professional Soldiers
blog that has been signed as of this writing by more than 1,100
current and former U.S. Army Special Forces soldiers, the Green Berets.
The soldiers say first it’s important to define the issue and set the record
straight.
“The terms ‘assault weapon’ and ‘assault rifle’ are often confused,” they
say. “According to Bruce H. Kobayashi and Joseph E. Olson, writing in the
Stanford Law and Policy Review, ‘Prior to 1989, the term ‘assault weapon’ did
not exist in the lexicon of firearms. It is a political term, developed by
anti-gun publicists to expand the category of assaults rifles.’”
The Green Berets, who use the weapons, point out the M4A1 carbine is a U.S.
military service rifle – it is an assault rifle.”
Keep your gun rights: Sign new petition
“The AR-15 is not an assault rifle. The ‘AR’ in its name does not stand for
‘Assault Rifle’ – it is the designation from the first two letters of the
manufacturer’s name – ArmaLite Corporation. The AR-15 is designed so that it
cosmetically looks like the M4A1 carbine assault rifle, but it is impossible to
configure the AR-15 to be a fully automatic assault rifle. It is a single shot
semi-automatic rifle that can fire between 45 and 60 rounds per minute depending
on the skill of the operator. The M4A1 can fire up to 950 rounds per minute. In
1986, the federal government banned the import or manufacture of new fully
automatic firearms for sale to civilians. Therefore, the sale of assault rifles
are already banned or heavily restricted!”
Likewise, they say, a ban on “high-capacity” magazines would be irrelevant,
pointing to the shooting by Eric Harris at Columbine High School as proof. The
letter explains that when the first weapons ban was adopted in 1994,
manufacturers retooled their products to meet the requirements of the law.
“One of those ban-compliant firearms was the Hi-Point 995, which was sold
with ten-round magazines. In 1999, five years into the Federal Assault Weapons
Ban, the Columbine High School massacre occurred. One of the perpetrators, Eric
Harris, was armed with a Hi-Point 995. Undeterred by the ten-round capacity of
his magazines, Harris simply brought more of them: thirteen magazines would be
found in the massacre’s aftermath. Harris fired 96 rounds before killing
himself.”
And, underlying the issue, the letter says, is the Constitution’s assurance
of protection for the “sacrosanct” right of self-defense.
“Our Constitution established a system of governance that preserves,
protects, and holds sacrosanct the individual rights and primacy of the governed
as well as providing for the explicit protection of the governed from
governmental tyranny and/or oppression,” they say..
They write that it is easy to blame guns, but weapons aren’t really the
problem. Civilized society already proves it, they contend.
“We cite the experience in Great Britain,” they write. In 1987 was the
Hungerford massacre that killed 18, and the government followed with a 1988 law
banning semi-automatic guns. But eight years later, a “disturbed” man murdered
16 children and a teacher the Dunblane school. Immediately the law was amended
to ban “all private ownership of handguns.”
Somehow, criminals apparently didn’t get the message, the letter
suggests.
“Despite having the toughest gun control laws in the world, gun related
crimes increased in 2003 by 35 percent over the previous year with firearms used
in 9,974 recorded crimes… Gun related homicides were up 32 percent over the
same period. … Gun related crime had increased 65 percent since the Dunblane
massacre and implementation of the toughest gun control laws in the developed
world,” the letter says.
“In contrast, in 2009 (5 years after the Federal Assault Weapons Ban expired)
total firearm related homicides in the U.S. declined by 9 percent from the 2005
high,” the letter says, citing FBI statistics.
Since gun bans don’t really impact violence, what is the issue at hand?
“The purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure our ability to oppose
enemies foreign and domestic, a guarantee against disorder and tyranny,” the
Green Berets say.
“Throughout history, disarming the populace has always preceded tyrants’
accession of power. Hitler, Stalin, and Mao all disarmed their citizens prior to
installing their murderous regimes. At the beginning of our own nation’s
revolution, one of the first moves made by the British government was an attempt
to disarm our citizens. When our Founding Fathers ensured that the Second
Amendment was made a part of our Constitution, they were not just wasting ink.
They were acting to ensure our present security was never forcibly endangered by
tyrants, foreign or domestic.”
But school shootings are horrible and need to be addressed, they write.
“First, it is important that we recognize that this is not a gun control
problem; it is a complex sociological problem. No single course of action will
solve the problem.”
The military veterans say local schools should make their own decisions and
plans.
“Most recently the Cleburne Independent School District will become the first
district in North Texas to consider allowing some teachers to carry concealed
guns. We do not opine as to the appropriateness of this decision, but we do
support their right to make this decision for themselves.”
Further, those individuals with diagnosed conditions that impact their
ability to make decisions can be addressed with programs of treatment.
“In each of these mass shooting incidents the perpetrator was mentally
unstable,” the Green Berets says
Firearms safety programs in schools could help, and a repeal of laws making
them gun-free zones should be considered by local officials.
Also, the violence in video games needs to be addressed.
“”War and war-like behavior should not be glorified. Hollywood and video game
producers are exploiting something they know nothing about. General Sherman
famously said, ‘War is hell!’ Leave war to the professionals,’” the letter
says
“This is our country, these are our rights. We believe that it is time that
we take personal responsibility for our choices and actions rather than abdicate
that responsibility to someone else under the illusion that we have done
something that will make us all safer. We have a responsibility to stand by our
principles and act in accordance with them. Our children are watching and they
will follow the example we set,” they write.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/1100-green-berets-set-record-straight-on-guns/#uq4mDSCGuZsYr0gV.99
Obama’s new push for gun bans, but what do the professionals whose job it is to
use guns in the protection of their nation, their fellow countrymen and
themselves say?
Watch out
An open letter has been posted on the Professional Soldiers
blog that has been signed as of this writing by more than 1,100
current and former U.S. Army Special Forces soldiers, the Green Berets.
The soldiers say first it’s important to define the issue and set the record
straight.
“The terms ‘assault weapon’ and ‘assault rifle’ are often confused,” they
say. “According to Bruce H. Kobayashi and Joseph E. Olson, writing in the
Stanford Law and Policy Review, ‘Prior to 1989, the term ‘assault weapon’ did
not exist in the lexicon of firearms. It is a political term, developed by
anti-gun publicists to expand the category of assaults rifles.’”
The Green Berets, who use the weapons, point out the M4A1 carbine is a U.S.
military service rifle – it is an assault rifle.”
Keep your gun rights: Sign new petition
“The AR-15 is not an assault rifle. The ‘AR’ in its name does not stand for
‘Assault Rifle’ – it is the designation from the first two letters of the
manufacturer’s name – ArmaLite Corporation. The AR-15 is designed so that it
cosmetically looks like the M4A1 carbine assault rifle, but it is impossible to
configure the AR-15 to be a fully automatic assault rifle. It is a single shot
semi-automatic rifle that can fire between 45 and 60 rounds per minute depending
on the skill of the operator. The M4A1 can fire up to 950 rounds per minute. In
1986, the federal government banned the import or manufacture of new fully
automatic firearms for sale to civilians. Therefore, the sale of assault rifles
are already banned or heavily restricted!”
Likewise, they say, a ban on “high-capacity” magazines would be irrelevant,
pointing to the shooting by Eric Harris at Columbine High School as proof. The
letter explains that when the first weapons ban was adopted in 1994,
manufacturers retooled their products to meet the requirements of the law.
“One of those ban-compliant firearms was the Hi-Point 995, which was sold
with ten-round magazines. In 1999, five years into the Federal Assault Weapons
Ban, the Columbine High School massacre occurred. One of the perpetrators, Eric
Harris, was armed with a Hi-Point 995. Undeterred by the ten-round capacity of
his magazines, Harris simply brought more of them: thirteen magazines would be
found in the massacre’s aftermath. Harris fired 96 rounds before killing
himself.”
And, underlying the issue, the letter says, is the Constitution’s assurance
of protection for the “sacrosanct” right of self-defense.
“Our Constitution established a system of governance that preserves,
protects, and holds sacrosanct the individual rights and primacy of the governed
as well as providing for the explicit protection of the governed from
governmental tyranny and/or oppression,” they say..
They write that it is easy to blame guns, but weapons aren’t really the
problem. Civilized society already proves it, they contend.
“We cite the experience in Great Britain,” they write. In 1987 was the
Hungerford massacre that killed 18, and the government followed with a 1988 law
banning semi-automatic guns. But eight years later, a “disturbed” man murdered
16 children and a teacher the Dunblane school. Immediately the law was amended
to ban “all private ownership of handguns.”
Somehow, criminals apparently didn’t get the message, the letter
suggests.
“Despite having the toughest gun control laws in the world, gun related
crimes increased in 2003 by 35 percent over the previous year with firearms used
in 9,974 recorded crimes… Gun related homicides were up 32 percent over the
same period. … Gun related crime had increased 65 percent since the Dunblane
massacre and implementation of the toughest gun control laws in the developed
world,” the letter says.
“In contrast, in 2009 (5 years after the Federal Assault Weapons Ban expired)
total firearm related homicides in the U.S. declined by 9 percent from the 2005
high,” the letter says, citing FBI statistics.
Since gun bans don’t really impact violence, what is the issue at hand?
“The purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure our ability to oppose
enemies foreign and domestic, a guarantee against disorder and tyranny,” the
Green Berets say.
“Throughout history, disarming the populace has always preceded tyrants’
accession of power. Hitler, Stalin, and Mao all disarmed their citizens prior to
installing their murderous regimes. At the beginning of our own nation’s
revolution, one of the first moves made by the British government was an attempt
to disarm our citizens. When our Founding Fathers ensured that the Second
Amendment was made a part of our Constitution, they were not just wasting ink.
They were acting to ensure our present security was never forcibly endangered by
tyrants, foreign or domestic.”
But school shootings are horrible and need to be addressed, they write.
“First, it is important that we recognize that this is not a gun control
problem; it is a complex sociological problem. No single course of action will
solve the problem.”
The military veterans say local schools should make their own decisions and
plans.
“Most recently the Cleburne Independent School District will become the first
district in North Texas to consider allowing some teachers to carry concealed
guns. We do not opine as to the appropriateness of this decision, but we do
support their right to make this decision for themselves.”
Further, those individuals with diagnosed conditions that impact their
ability to make decisions can be addressed with programs of treatment.
“In each of these mass shooting incidents the perpetrator was mentally
unstable,” the Green Berets says
Firearms safety programs in schools could help, and a repeal of laws making
them gun-free zones should be considered by local officials.
Also, the violence in video games needs to be addressed.
“”War and war-like behavior should not be glorified. Hollywood and video game
producers are exploiting something they know nothing about. General Sherman
famously said, ‘War is hell!’ Leave war to the professionals,’” the letter
says
“This is our country, these are our rights. We believe that it is time that
we take personal responsibility for our choices and actions rather than abdicate
that responsibility to someone else under the illusion that we have done
something that will make us all safer. We have a responsibility to stand by our
principles and act in accordance with them. Our children are watching and they
will follow the example we set,” they write.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/1100-green-berets-set-record-straight-on-guns/#uq4mDSCGuZsYr0gV.99